Memorandum from the Orwell Astronomical
Society (Ipswich) submitted by Kenneth J Goward FRAS, Chairman
of the Society
OUR ORGANISATION
The Orwell Astronomical Society (Ipswich) is
a local astronomical society whose growing membership is now well
in excess of 100 people. Our membersmen and women of all
agesrepresent a wide cross-section of the local population.
We also have a number of under 16s as junior members.
Over a period of more than 30 years society
members have restored an historic Victorian observatory (Orwell
Park Observatory). The Observatory, part of a property, which
is now a school, is maintained and operated by the society for
the benefit of members and of the local community. The society
arranges visits for local groups (Guides, Scouts, Women's groups,
Men's groups, special interest groups and institutions, etc) and
holds public open evenings each year that provide an opportunity
for people to view the night sky through the observatories telescopes.
For the past 30 years the observatory has given access to our
Universe for many people and today between 500 and a 1,000 people
visit in a typical year.
THE EFFECTS
OF LIGHT
POLLUTION
We are fortunate that most people in the rural
and semi-rural area adjacent to the observatory are themselves
concerned about light pollution, primarily because of its damaging
effect on rural tranquillity and its degrading effect on the rural
environment. We have, however, suffered a worrying increase in
light pollution that comes mainly from larger centres of population
and industrial sites in the area. The nearby Port of Felixstowe
in particular has seen rapid expansion over recent years and with
it, a noticeable increase in light pollution to our south eastern
skyline as viewed from the Observatory. As far as the particular
issue of the night sky is concerned, the light pollution is detrimental
to our visitors and us and to those who, though not particularly
interested in the subject of astronomy, appreciate the importance
of the "skyscape" as part of the natural environment.
THE SOLUTIONS
We feel that planning guidelines, although helping
to some extent, should be wider ranging and stronger. There is
certainly a need to make controls legally enforceable and ensure
local authorities can and do act against any breaches of such
controls. Additional regulations controlling light pollution could
also help parish councils and members of the community who want
to protect their local environment as well as benefiting astronomy.
Applying controls on design, intensity and number
of lights would help control light pollution without the need
for other methods of quantification of light pollution. Parameters
such as luminance and Upward Wasted Light Ratios (UWLR) are available
for use in setting guidelines and regulations. Controls on both
UWLR and total luminance are important and necessary. A study
of the issue of skyglow could, however, enable an approximate
quantification of the phenomenon that would also be useful.
Improvements in the design of lighting would
also be important in reducing light pollution. More consideration
should also be given to investigating lower intensity lighting
designs and alternatives to lighting for safety and security applications
in both urban and rural areas.
ENFORCEMENT
Our "general" impression is that the
problem of light pollution is not given sufficient priority and
that little or no effort is being made by local authorities to
enforce any current or proposed lighting regulations.
22 April 2003
|