Select Committee on Regulatory Reform Second Report


Other matter


45. Under our current Standing Orders (No. 141(5)) we may report to the House on any matter arising from our consideration of a proposal. One matter that arises in our consideration of this RRO was the retention of the "MP filter" whereby complaints could only be referred to the Parliamentary Ombudsman via a Member of Parliament. As noted above, the existence of this MP filter was criticised by a number of respondents: this view was shared by a number of MPs according to the most recent survey of Members' views and the Public Administration Select Committee.[2] We asked the Cabinet Office about the removal of the MP filter. In its response, the Cabinet Office stated that it was the Government's view that a Regulatory Reform Order would not be an appropriate vehicle for making such changes and that these changes could only be made by primary legislation. We are content with this assessment.


2   For example, see Public Administration Committee, Third Report of Session 1999-2000, Review of Public Sector Ombudsmen in England, paragraph 12, HC 612 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 15 March 2007