United Kingdom Parliament
Publications & records
Advanced search
 HansardArchivesResearchHOC PublicationsHOL PublicationsCommittees
Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Mr M Baker (FL 41)

  1.  On 25th June 2007 my property was seriously threatened with flooding when a beck overflowed flooding the road.

The Authorities/organisations involved with controlling the beck are:

    1.  York Council who approved developments which drain into the beck.

    2.  Foss Internal Drainage Board (FIDB) who manage and maintain the beck

    3.  Yorkshire Water who maintain the pumps and pumping Station.

  2.  Queries made to York Council, FIDB and Yorkshire Water regarding whether the beck could cope with the run off water in heavy rain resulted in the following:

  York Council has approved, over the years, a grand total of hundreds of house extensions, conservatories and single house developments in the catchement area of Westfield Beck.

  They do not know the the safe capacity of the beck or the volume of "run off" water entering the beck. They advised the following "Along with the board we have long been concerned by the cumulative effect of these developments (and the paving over of gardens which is completely unregulated) but there is little that can be done by either authority."

  Yorkshire Water would not answer queries about the pumping capacity on account of their security policy.

  3.  Issues for investigation:

    (A)  In order to comply with government policy (Planning Regulations) councils are approving developments that will place other houses at high risk of flooding. Councils when approving planning applications should be required to give prevention of flooding to other properties priority over Planning and Building Regulations.

    (C)  Stop unregulated paving over of gardens.

    (D)  Only one Authority to be responsible for all drainage and that Authority to be subject to the Freedom of Information Act.

    (E)  Authorities responsible for keeping watercourses clear should be required to comply with standards that should be made public and can easily be understood by the public.

    (F)  More attention to be given to the effect of cumulative minor developments on increasing flood risk. eg Run Off water from 40 house extensions can be more than a major development of 10 houses.

M Baker

August 2007





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 7 May 2008