United Kingdom Parliament
Publications & records
Advanced search
 HansardArchivesResearchHOC PublicationsHOL PublicationsCommittees
Select Committee on Public Accounts Fifteenth Report


3  Enforcement

22. For the majority of schemes, TPR has used education and enablement (support to trustees and pension scheme professionals) to encourage those who govern schemes to protect members' interests.[59] However, if TPR believes trustees are ineffective in protecting members' benefits it can intervene directly, for example by issuing a direction requiring an employer to provide financial support to a scheme, or by disqualifying a trustee.[60] To be effective the regulator must be clear about when it will intervene, what it expects from those regulated, and to use its powers if members' benefits are at risk.[61]

Use of powers

23. In their 2003 report, our predecessors found that Opra had inadequate powers, for example, in terms of enforcing compliance.[62] TPR has been granted additional powers which include being able to act against employers who fail to support adequately a scheme, by issuing a Financial Support Direction or Contribution Notice, as well as widening the circumstances in which TPR can act against trustees for not being fit and proper.[63]

24. TPR considers that these powers are adequate for its current role.[64] In its survey of those who run pension schemes, 73% considered that TPR had adequate powers (with 8% considering that it did not).[65] Legislation will be needed, however, when TPR becomes the regulator of the planned personal accounts scheme, and the new Pensions Bill is intended to provide for this.[66]

25. To date TPR has used its education and enablement activities with those who govern pension schemes in preference to using enforcement action.[67] It has only issued two determinations to issue a financial support directive and disqualified one trustee.[68] TPR considers that the threat of using its powers has meant that it has not yet had to use them widely, and some of its new powers remain unused.[69]

Transparency and scheme understanding

26. As well as protecting members of a particular scheme, the value of enforcement is in educating the market as to TPR's requirements and demonstrating that it will take action if it needs to protect members' benefits.[70] To achieve this TPR needs to be transparent in its decision making. Prior to September 2007, however, TPR took the view that, because of issues of confidentiality and the risk of gaming, it was better to publish information on its determinations when making use of its enforcement powers on an exception basis only.[71] In September 2007, TPR adopted a presumption in favour of publication in all future determinations except in special circumstances such as where there are commercial confidentiality issues.[72] Following our examination, TPR advised us that they intend to publish those determinations made previously, unless there was a good reason not to do so, such as where publication would give rise to adverse market behaviours or disclose sensitive personal data.[73]




59   C&AG's Report, para 4.17 Back

60   C&AG's Report, Figures 12 & 13 Back

61   C&AG's Report, para 4.19 Back

62   Committee of Public Accounts, OPRA: Tackling the Risks to Pension Scheme Members, para 10 Back

63   C&AG's Report, para 4.3 Back

64   Qq 26, 64 Back

65   Qq 73,74; C&AG's Report, para 4.5 Back

66   Q 64 Back

67   C&AG's Report, para 4.17 Back

68   Qq 9, 10, 24, 25 Back

69   C&AG's Report, para 4.2 Back

70   C&AG's Report, para 4.19 Back

71   Qq 75-80 Back

72   Qq 79-82; C&AG's Report, para 4.21 Back

73   Ev 12 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 24 April 2008