2 The effectiveness of the Cabinet
Office's work in promoting the use of shared services across government
8. In the years 2005-06 and 2006-07, the cost of
the Cabinet Office's Shared Services Team was £3.0 million.[16]
The Cabinet Office was unable, at the time of our hearing, to
explain how this money was spent.[17]
At the Committee's request, the National Audit Office has since
reviewed the spending (Figure 1).[18]
The review showed that the Cabinet Office had incorrectly included
£1.0 million in its previous estimate reported to the Committee,
mostly on contracts not attributable to the Shared Services Team.
While this error will not have affected the Cabinet Office's financial
accounts for the two years, it further demonstrates poor cost
control.
Figure 1: The costs of the Cabinet Office Shared Services Team
| Costs over two years: 2005-06 and 2006-07
| £000
|
| Programme management |
404 |
| Work with government users, including sector plans and identifying the total cost of HR and finance services
| 1,010 |
| Market development, including analysing market dynamics and identifying practical barriers to shared services
| 580 |
| Business engagement, including events to bring suppliers and potential purchasers together
| 195 |
| Solution design, creating a manual for shared services
| 311 |
| Support, including seminars and special interest groups
| 541 |
| Total | 3,040
|
Note: the table does not sum exactly because each
individual figure is rounded to the nearest £000.
Source: National Audit Office analysis of Cabinet
Office data
9. The Cabinet Office's Shared Services Team has
not done any systematic analysis of the risks in adopting shared
services or provided any advice on how to manage them.[19]
These risks include not gaining customer acceptance if shared
services are seen to lead to deterioration in standards, declining
staff morale if face-to-face customer contact is reduced, for
example, through the use of call centres, and the need to handle
large amounts of sensitive data concentrated in fewer centres.[20]
Without changes in the culture of many public bodies and very
different approaches such as streamlined processes for low value
invoices, the savings to be gained will not be secured.[21]
10. The Cabinet Office's Shared Services Team has
tried to assist the development of shared services across government
by creating a web-based repository of information and tools for
departments to use.[22]
The website gives advice on the stages involved in developing
shared services from the original vision through to their operation,
and provides pointers to other sources of advice on matters like
project management.[23]
It attracts around 4,000 to 5,000 visits each month, with 1,700
downloads a month on average. However, the Cabinet Office is unable
to say how useful departments have found the material.[24]
11. Some publicly funded bodies are unable to recover
Value Added Tax (VAT) when they buy shared services from external
providers.[25] The Cabinet
Office considers this a barrier to the wider adoption of shared
services which may be inhibiting £70 million in annual savings
in non-departmental public bodies and tens of millions of pounds
in higher and further education institutions.[26]
At the request of the Cabinet Office, HM Treasury has been examining
the scope for a solution since May 2006, but it does not know
when it might find one.[27]
The Treasury has provided only broad assurance that evidence on
the scale of the VAT problem will be factored into the Chancellor's
decisions on tax.[28]
The problem repeats previous examples of VAT-related difficulties
dragging on without resolution, for example, in hindering academies
from opening their school buildings to other users[29]
(on which the Treasury has now taken action), and in affecting
decisions about demolition or refurbishment in housing market
renewal.[30]
12. The Cabinet Office is encouraging smaller departments
to buy corporate services from larger departments but this strategy
is hampered by the speed at which two of the largestthe
Department for Work and Pensions and HM Revenue and Customsare
able to develop their services to meet the requirements of other
organisations.[31] So
far, only two public sector organisations have committed to buying
their corporate services in this way: the Cabinet Office and the
Department for Children, Schools and Families.
16 Q 83; Ev 15-16 Back
17
Qq 86-92 Back
18
Q 96 Back
19
C&AG's Report, para 4.3 Back
20
Qq 5-9, 17-18, 66-68 Back
21
Qq 56-57, 64, 110-111 Back
22
Q 94 Back
23
www.cio.gov.uk/shared_services Back
24
Qq 93, 95 Back
25
Qq 107, 117-119; C&AG's Report, para 4.6 Back
26
Qq 108-109; C&AG's Report, para 4.6 Back
27
Q 115 Back
28
Ev 20 Back
29
C&AG's Report, The Academies Programme, HC (Session
2006-07) 254 Back
30
C&AG's Report, Housing Market Renewal, HC (Session
2007-08) 20 Back
31
Q 106 Back
|