2 Reaching the workless
9. To achieve the aspiration of 80% employment, many
people who are economically inactive will have to be encouraged
to seek work. Many of these economically inactive people are likely
to live in workless households. There is, however, no systematic
strategy underpinning outreach activity, with outreach services
varying according to the resources which Jobcentre Plus has available
in each area and activity by local partners. The reach of current
programme 'gateways' is limited. For example, work-focused interviews
do not target all workless people, only those who received Jobseeker's
Allowance. The Department has begun to work with local partners
to develop local solutions. The new City Strategy, for example,
is working in 15 areas of the United Kingdom to promote innovative
approaches to getting people back to work and to tailor local
provision to the needs of the local labour market.[14]
10. Worklessness occurs chiefly in concentrated pockets
in a small number of deprived communities across the United Kingdom,
with 60% of all concentrations of worklessness occurring in 10%
of wards. Jobcentre Plus needs to work closely with its local
partners to tackle pockets of worklessness, but in many cases
the sheer number of different parties and initiatives involved
places a heavy burden on resources. For example, around 125 different
bodies are involved in some 300 separate employment support programmes
in Glasgow, and Jobcentre Plus district managers can have up to
27 Local Strategic Partnerships in their district.
11. Recent restructuring has improved the way that
the Department and the Learning and Skills Council coordinate
their work locally. The City Strategy is helping to provide more
flexible and cost-effective services with, for example, work trials
in City Strategy areas running for six weeks rather than the usual
three weeks. Providing greater local flexibility on issues such
as allowing people to train full-time while still receiving benefits
will require primary legislation. The Department has advised City
Strategy consortia to limit their requests for flexibilities to
those changes that do not require primary legislation.[15]
12. Few partners of benefits claimants are participating
in the voluntary New Deal for Partners, with only 200 people joining
the programme every month. Jobcentre Plus is addressing low take-up
by making more use of the telephone to remind partners to attend
work-focused interviews. From April 2008, partners for whom a
benefits claim is being made will be required to attend an interview
every six months.[16]
13. When an individual is part of a larger workless
household, caring responsibilities or parenting issues may need
to be addressed before that person can get into and stay in work.
These complex needs may involve a number of members of the household,
not just the primary benefit claimant. Many partners do not consider
looking for work because of wider problems within the family,
such as caring responsibilities. The New Deal for Lone Parents
has been successful as it has taken into account both individuals'
job-seeking needs as well as parenting needs. Parents on other
New Deal programmes are not routinely offered help with finding
childcare or a job that fits with their caring commitments. The
Harker report on child poverty recommended implementing a 'New
Deal for Parents', which aligns support for lone and couple parents.[17]
14. Where Jobcentre Plus has advance warning of substantial
job losses, it usually works with the Learning and Skills Council
to prepare employment support and retraining packages to enable
redundant employees to find new jobs. Our report on the closure
of MG Rover found that the Department had been effective in arranging
immediate support for former employees.[18]
14 Qq 4, 60 ; C&AG's Report, paras 2.23-2.28 Back
15
Qq 7-8, 20-21, 54-55; C&AG's Report, paras 1.7-1.8, 4.9-4.12 Back
16
Qq 57, 61-64, 80-81; C&AG's Report, paras 2.6-2.11 Back
17
L Harker, Delivering on child poverty: what would it take?
Department for Work and Pensions ,2006 Back
18
Committee of Public Accounts, Fifty-seventh report of Session
2005-06, The closure of MG Rover, HC 1003; Q 17 Back
|