United Kingdom Parliament
Publications & records
Advanced search
 HansardArchivesResearchHOC PublicationsHOL PublicationsCommittees
Select Committee on Public Accounts Fiftieth Report


3  The uncertainty on the deal for the Olympic Village

12.  The Olympic Village, with an estimated construction cost of over £1,000 million, is the largest Games project. The Village will accommodate athletes and officials during the Games, and be converted into homes after the Games, with 30% to be available as affordable housing. The project is linked to the private sector development of the adjacent Stratford City Retail Centre.[28]

13.  The Olympic Delivery Authority's intention is that development of the Village will be led and financed by the private sector. The private sector financing is outside the budget for the Games, although the budget includes provision for the Delivery Authority to contribute to the cost of infrastructure for the Village. In February 2007, the Olympic Delivery Authority selected Lend Lease as the preferred developer, and expected to agree the deal by the end of 2007.[29]

14.  At the time of our hearing at the end of June 2008 the deal had not been completed. The uncertainty in the financial and property markets has increased the difficulties of securing private sector finance and impacted on the commercial viability of the deal. The global credit squeeze had particularly affected the residential property values and, therefore, the ability of the private sector to raise finance.[30] The Olympic Delivery Authority told us that Lend Lease, in a recent Statement to the Australian Stock Exchange, had confirmed that it expected to obtain the debt financing by the end of 2008. The Delivery Authority is also exploring other sources of funding for the Village, including a government contribution to the cost of affordable housing.[31]

15.  Meanwhile, work to prepare the site for the Village has continued and construction started in May 2008. The Delivery Authority has paid for site preparation work as part of its planned financial contribution, conscious of the need to avoid slippage and that it would have to pay heavily to accelerate the project later on.[32] The Delivery Authority acknowledged, however, that it was likely to need some of the Funders' Group Contingency (see paragraph 20) to fund the Village.[33]

16.  The number of homes to be provided after the Games has been reduced. By planning only for the accommodation required at the time of the Games, the Olympic Delivery Authority has reduced the number of apartments from the 4,200 originally planned to around 3,300. The Delivery Authority considers that the reduction reduces the risk to the project, and confirmed that there would be sufficient apartments to accommodate the athletes and officials during the Games.[34]


28   Q 30; C&AG's Report, paras 3.20-3.22 Back

29   Qq 10, 31-32; C&AG's Report, paras 3.21-3.22 Back

30   Qq 10, 42-43, 47; C&AG's Report, para 3.23 Back

31   Qq 10, 47 Back

32   Qq 10, 48; C&AG's Report, para 3.23 Back

33   Qq 31, 42 Back

34   Qq 10, 46 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 24 July 2008