7 Conclusion
200. Government needs to be open to outside interests
and ideas. In recent years, it has become more open, in extended
consultation, new sources of policy advice, and in greater movement
of people in and out of government. All this brings benefits.
Yet there are also risks, if the process is not carefully managed.
The greatest risk is that some interests may acquire excessive
influence, or are believed to have excessive influence, buttressing
a public perception that government is not to be trusted.
201. Our proposals are designed to mitigate this
risk, in a way that is at once proportionate and effective. Those
who do lobbying business with government on a continuing basis
need to do so within the terms of an agreed framework. This means
obligations on those who lobby and on those who are lobbied. There
is some recognition of this already in the voluntary codes adopted
by lobbyists, and in the various duties placed on ministers and
civil servants. However, it is now time to go further, and to
do so in a considered way rather than as a response to scandal
or crisis.
202. The key, in this area as in others, is transparency.
There is a public interest in knowing who is lobbying whom about
what. We believe that this can be achieved in a reasonably straightforward
way. Other jurisdictions are deciding that this is an area that
needs attention, and it now deserves systematic attention here
too. We have tried to learn from practice elsewhere, but also
to root our proposals in our own political tradition. Lobbying
enhances democracy; but can also subvert it. Our proposals are
designed to strengthen the former role, while making the latter
more difficult.
|